Feedback

Over the years i have received many different types off feed back but normally its all the same, i guess you could say that feed back is a genre. Usually when i look for feedback on my papers i get short brief responses unless its from a teacher. This type of feed back is normally blunt, right to the point and somewhat generalized. The feed back i get is more about little things as opposed to a main idea. The effectiveness of this type of feedback is its not too effective at all. Since the responses you get to your paper are brief and somewhat blunt that translates to the effectiveness of the feedback. The more feed back you get and the more in depth it goes has a direct tie to the quality of the feed back. When looking for the feedback i would like on my own papers it would have to be a type of feedback which is in depth and looking at the over all paper as opposed to just little points. The feedback would have to be from someone who isn't trying to fly though the paper to get corrections made it would be from someone who is taking their time to find the most mistakes they could. Also a main point i would like in my feedback is more ideas to add to the paper which i normally don't get when receiving feedback. Along with this i would like to see feedback which gives me ideas about how to arrange my points. If i got feedback of this nature i feel my papers and overall writing would improve.